Permaculture San Francisco

Bringing together the Permaculture community of San Francisco

Bringing together professionals, educators, designers, consultants, and activists around the common thread of Permaculture for a village rennisance in the urban pulse of the city of San Francisco.Sheet mulching lawns to gardensThis group site is for the community to use as a way to post events and resources.San Francisco is a meca on the west coast for alter ...learn more

GROUP DETAILS

Created: Oct 30, 2007

Updated: Nov 25, 2009

Membership: Open

Semi-Private

Sm_avatar
Created: Mar 23, 2008
Updated: Nov 15, 2009
Viewed: 228 times

Danielle Brigida

starfocus
Lg_avatar

Actions



User Info 

Email: danielle.brigida [at] gmail.com
 
Address: Falls Church, Virginia
United States
 
I Speak: English
 
I Am: Activist
 
Member Since: March 23, 2008
 
Local Time: Fri Nov 27 06:57:17
 

Network [List] · [Visualize]

Connected with 26 people
Connected with 0 solutions
Connected with 0 jobs
Connected with 0 wikipages

 

Areas of Focus 

Renewable Energy (3926 people)  |  Biological Control (579 people)  |  Gardening (3097 people)  |  Global Beef Industry (325 people)  |  Organic Farming (3650 people)  |  Soil Conservation and Management (1146 people)  |  Composting (2169 people)  |  Amphibians (291 people)  |  Animal and Plant Trafficking (351 people)  |  Animal Welfare and Rights (1393 people)  |  Artiodactyls (96 people)  |  Bats (305 people)  |  Birds (778 people)  |  Canids (178 people)  |  Cetaceans (294 people)  |  Elephants (340 people)  |  Endangered Animal Species Protection (1622 people)  |  Endemic Animal Species Protection (547 people)  |  Felids (174 people)  |  Fish (560 people)  |  Insects (326 people)  |  Lagomorphs (87 people)  |  Lepidoptera (131 people)  |  Marsupials (130 people)  |  Mollusks and Crustaceans (159 people)  |  Mustelids and Viverrids (93 people)  |  Perissodactyls (87 people)  |  Pinnipeds (129 people)  |  Primates (284 people)  |  Raptors (274 people)  |  Reptiles (268 people)  |  Rodents (124 people)  |  Sirenians (98 people)  |  Ursids (108 people)  |  Wildlife Ecology (1653 people)  |  Wildlife Habitat Conservation (2375 people)  |  Wildlife Law and Policy (688 people)  |  Wildlife Management (828 people)  |  Communication Training (1735 people)  |  Nonprofit Law (660 people)  |  Organizational Funding (1342 people)  |  Organizational Governance (1045 people)  |  Organizational Support and Management (1538 people)  |  Philanthropy (1383 people)  |  Social Entrepreneurship (3676 people)  |  Training for Nonprofits (2009 people)  |  Conservation and Recreation (1195 people)  |  Conservation and the Commons (890 people)  |  Conservation Area Creation (537 people)  |  Conservation Area Protection (834 people)  |  Conservation Biology (875 people)  |  Conservation Policy (746 people)  |  Land Restoration (1334 people)  |  Land Stewardship (1628 people)  |  Natural Heritage Conservation (758 people)  |  Natural Resource Conservation (1630 people)  |  Practical Conservation (962 people)  |  Wilderness (1761 people)  |  Evolutionary Ecology (1105 people)  |  Access To Education (2289 people)  |  Education, Government and Sustainability (2056 people)  |  Environmental Education (3385 people)  |  Environmental Resource Center (935 people)  |  Green Schools (2369 people)  |  Literacy (1192 people)  |  Natural Resource Education (1213 people)  |  Public and Government Education (944 people)  |  Sustainability Education (4208 people)  |  Climate Change (4729 people)  |  Emissions Trading (1144 people)  |  Greenhouse Gases (1332 people)  |  Consumption and Green Consumers (2200 people)  |  Ecolabeling and Certification (1238 people)  |  Ecological Footprint (2223 people)  |  Environmental Monitoring (981 people)  |  Industrial Ecology (781 people)  |  Life Cycle Assessment (1169 people)  |  Natural Resource Management (1319 people)  |  Recycling and Reuse (2590 people)  |  Sustainable Production (2468 people)  |  Advertising (1075 people)  |  Film (1538 people)  |  Internet (2557 people)  |  Journalism and the Press (1497 people)  |  Media and Communication (2712 people)  |  Photography (1709 people)  |  Publishing (1034 people)  |  Radio and Audio (905 people)  |  Television (820 people)  |  Video (1197 people)  |  Chemical Pollution (732 people)  |  Energy Pollution (754 people)  |  Global Pollution (1153 people)  |  Hazardous Solid Waste (535 people)  |  Light and Noise Pollution (542 people)  |  Petroleum in the Environment (521 people)  |  Pollution Prevention and Reduction (1168 people)  |  Pollution Remediation (585 people)  |  Toxic and Hazardous Substances (686 people)  |  Water Pollution (1346 people)  

About

I am a Social Media Coordinator for the National Wildlife Federation. I use social media to protect wildlife by inspiring others. I develop and manage NWF's profiles on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, Change.org, and many others. I also manage NWF's blog at www.wildlifepromise.org.

I grew up wanting to write for Ranger Rick magazine. Working for National Wildlife Federation is something I've always wanted to do and I love using the internet as a way to spread NWF's powerful message.

Comments (1 - 3 of 3)

Login to Post a Comment.
Sm_avatar
VanessaSerrao 15 days ago
Hi Danielle,  Thanks for joining NatureBreak!  I'd love to talk with you more about your work in social media at NWF. 
Sm_avatar
utkarshliladhar 6 months ago

well done !!!!!!!!  keep it up...

i think you are realy activist......

Are you someone who is looking to do something meaningful with your life? Are you someone who believes that the world should be a better place? Are you someone who wants to make a difference? There are many of us who would answer all of those questions with an emphatic ‘YES!’ – yet the choices and opportunities put before us by our society, education and culture often seem to be very inadequate in helping us translate our intentions into meaningful practice. We are all faced with numerous questions and issues in all facets of our own lives, as well as that of society at large, to which there seem to be no answers in sight:

· Are exploitation, poverty, injustice, discrimination and war an inevitable part of human society or is it possible to have a just and equitable society?

· Are development and ecological sustainability always going to be at loggerheads with one another, or is possible to utilise technology for the benefit of humanity, without disturbing the ecological balance of our planet?

· Is the education of children just about rote, memorisation and eventually getting better jobs, or is it possible to have an educational alternative that not only helps children become thinking individuals but also better human beings?

· Are human lives bound to be an endless struggle just to meet one’s material needs, or is it possible to meet one’s economic requirements as well as lead intellectually and emotionally fulfilling lives?

· Are relationships between human beings bound to be full of conflict, differences, inequality, emotional distress and unhappy compromises, or is it possible to have extremely happy, contented, meaningful interpersonal relationships?

· Is unhappiness, meaninglessness and discontent an inherent part of human existence or is it possible for all human beings to live purposeful, meaningful lives?

The long history of mankind has seen numerous attempts to answer the above questions. While many religious and philosophical schools of thought have put forth ‘solutions’ to some of the above problems, their answers have often been mystical and unable to change the inequitable and exploitative structures of society. Moreover, these very ideas have been used as a means to justify religious and communal violence for many centuries. Postindustrial society has seen an intensification of the above problems and questions. Consequently, numerous ideologies, socio-political movements and social experiments have sought solutions in the form of equality of opportunities, freedom from injustice and exploitation, the creation of classless societies, equal access to natural resources, as well as protection of the environment. Undoubtedly, these attempts have had some impact on the society we live in. However, apart from having their own share of supporters and detractors, no ideology, movement or experiment has been able to show any definitive outcomes. As a consequence, many of us have come to believe that no conclusive outcomes, results or solutions are even possible. We often work with the assumption that a meaningful life and a truly just, equitable society are utopian ideals that can only be dreamt about or aspired towards, but never actually realised or concretised.

Yet the need for answers/solutions remains. In fact, it is far greater than ever before. We are faced with a rapidly globalising world, with increasing inequalities, intensifying ecological imbalance, heightening war and violence and sharpened fundamentalist identities. Moreover, a materialist-consumerist culture and way of life is spreading in all parts of the world. The irony of this socio-economic structure/way of life/culture is that while it creates large numbers of ‘have-nots’, the people who are at the bottom of the pyramid and are struggling for survival; the very ‘haves’ who are at the top (and higher end) of the social pyramid are struggling with the meaninglessness and hollowness of their lives. Our current way of life seems inhuman and unsustainable from all perspectives.

So the question still remains – is there any alternative to the existing social, economic, cultural order? Is there any philosophy/set of ideas/worldview that creates the possibilities of a meaningful way of life, and a humane, just and sustainable society? Is it possible for all human beings to have all facets of their lives harmoniously interconnected – be it the personal, inter-personal, social or ecological? What we want to do now is to go beyond a general hopeful vision and a few promising small-scale experiments to a deeper, clearer, and more specific understanding of how such a way of life, and society could actually be developed. Any such ‘understanding’ would have to be universal; that is, it should satisfy the needs and requirements of all human beings. Any such philosophy that seeks to provide answers has to be one that can be examined and analysed by each individual, that is, it has to be free from any sectarianism, mysticism or spiritual leaders.

Sm_avatar
Janine 8 months ago

Thanks for your passion for making use of all media to help wildlife!  If you're especially interested in Bats, you're welcome to join  the WE Bat group and post useful resources from the NWF.  Thanks, Danielle!

1 to 3 of 3 Comments