View Michael's Personal Activity Report | View Comments by michael
Comments (1 - 20 of 162)
|
View Context | Flag comment for removal michael about 1 year ago
Yeah, I think the features mentioned here should be integrated into the blog feature mentioned somewhere else. When someone post an announcement, proposal, etc, on a blog, that post becomes searchable/filterable. I probably wouldn't want to read every new announcement, but all posts related to legal issues and community organizing would be interesting.
|
|
I think Word Press would be a great blog platform to integrate. It is popular and has a great look and feel.
|
|
A think the concept of finding niche markets for switching to a more sustainable economy is a great way to approach the problem, and the only way to do it without massive social unrest because dramatic changes could cause an inability to provide basic services and security. I'm concerned that we've waiting too long to avoid that scenario, but besides securing the historical integrity of who tried to help and who didn't, there isn't much use in complaining about our past failures.
Carbon sequestration could be a false horse though, as the amount of energy required to compress the carbon gas, pump it through a long pipeline to a suitable place to be buried and then pumping it deep underground, is very high. You're right that it might be unsustainable, but it also might be self-defeating. I certainly believe technology has a role to play in our transition to a more sustainable economy, but it will have much more to do with our attitudes about consumption and waste than technology. I don't believe you are saying this Ed, but sometimes people put a false hope in the human ability to use technology to save ourselves. We need to stop thinking of it as our solution of first resort. Mike |
|
Great Ed, I'll look more into that Denmark contest.
I think whether a building or municipality is 'on the grid' or 'off the grid' will become less relevant. I hope the debate starts to focus on, "Who should own the gird?" The debate over the efficiency of public and private enterprise is an ancient one, but one I'm only partially interested in. It shouldn't matter in an authentic democracy. If voters decide to own their gird, then they should own it. More than anything, we suffer from a lack of democratic imagination about what possible in a democratic society. Cool, Mike |
|
Hey Duane,
Thanks for your input on this topic. While it could be a while before definitive direction is taken, your comments will help shape the direction and deliberations. From being involved in this discussion for years, and also as a member of WiserEarth, maybe I can articulate the current justification for not including for-profits: 1) Our culture already showers attention and resources on business and government, only two pillars of our society. The third pillar, civil society, gets almost no attention. WiserEarth was originally developed to dedicate a space to them. A place they can call their own. Once the floodgates open, for-profits could come to dominate this space and dilute the space for civil society. 2) WiserEarth is already selective about the non-profits that are entered. It focuses on proactive organizations that address root causes and tries to avoid reactive, palliative organizations. It may be difficult to justify why some for-profits are included, and some non-profits are not included. To avoid this, at least two technical features need to be improved on WiserEarth before for-profits can be safety integrated. 1) A user should have powerful filtering results to include or exclude for-profits. Our filters don't include that at this point. 2) More challenging, the metrics by which for-profits AND non-profits are judged, needs to be articulated. The staff of NCI has started this process, but the metrics should truly be developed by the community at large. This presents a further challenge: How does the community decide? At this point, WiserEarth has no system for rating or voting and until that happens, big decisions such as this will be left to early adopters with strong opinions. I know this isn't exactly what you are looking for, but I hope to clarify that for-profits are not included, simply because they are for-profits. A precautionary principle has been adopted, so if or when for-profits are included, it is done correctly. Best, Michael |
|
Hi Ed,
Thanks for bringing up this issue of how to finance carbon reduction strategies. Climate bonds in particular are an interesting idea, and one I haven't heard discussed much. I recently finished the anti-monopoly classic, Wealth Against Commonwealth by Henry Demarest Lloyd. It was published in 1894, near the end of the robber baron age at the advent of the regulatory state. The topic of the regulatory state and who is was actually designed to protect is an interesting one, but not one I'll get into now. Lloyd tells the tale of two cities that challenged the oil combinations power to extort high prices. In Columbus, MS, the locals used a market boycott technique for three years to defeat the monopoly, despite the combination's lower prices in an attempt to drive out competition. The good people of Columbus recognized that the lower prices were only temporary, and once the competition was gone, the prices would go up. This technique is used by Wal-Mart to this day. The other city, Toledo, OH, was fed up with having to buy oil from the combination. So they used all of their local and state government institutions to pass an initiative to develop a municipal gas company and fund it by issuing a municipal bonds. The combination used every technique possible (many of them illegal - including destruction of property) to prevent this municipality from taking this democratic step. This included committing libel against the creditworthiness of the city to stop investors from buying the municipal bonds. Toledo was forced to crawl their way for years through a piecemeal process to develop their oil production and pipeline. I wonder if the same forces would be brought to bare on a city or state that tried to issue a bond today to start a municipal, decentralized solar power utility. Are there any stories of cities taking such a measure? Mike |
|
I hear where you are coming from. I don't own a pet, but I do like dogs and wouldn't mind having one. I've justified it by watching how happy dogs are when they are with a good owner.
Lots of animals though, should probably not be pets. I don't care for seeing parrots, lizards, and ferrets in small cages. I'm sure others will disagree with me though. |
|
Hey Bowo,
Thanks for bring some visibility to this. It is a pretty good idea, and you're right - it is quite common. Mike |
|
Hey JT,
Thanks for this article about warming affecting the dog sled race. It is an interesting perspective on climate change. |
|
Hey Rob,
Thanks for this post! Very interesting. It is nice to see some governments cooperating on the sustainability front. You're right, this is not in WiserEarth directly. Of course, many chapters of the WWF are in WiserEarth, but they probably do not include a list of their projects, so it wouldn't show up in a search. Hopefully in the nearer-future, WiserEarth will be able to have RSS feeds, and attach those feeds to relevant content on the site. For example, this article would be connected to the Sustainable Cities and Sustainable Urban and Regional Planning portals. In the longer-term hopefully WiserEarth will be integrated with WiserGovernment, to provide a space for great government initiatives like this one. Thanks again! Mike |
|
Voting is a great start, but living in a democratic society takes more than just voting once every couple years. It requires we act in democratic ways in our everyday lives. While I think all the major candidates operate within a narrow spectrum of political discourse, some are clearly better than others. I hope everyone makes a point of doing something just a little more than voting: write a letter to the editor, do phone banking, go door to door, or volunteer at your local polling station. |
|
I think the portal template you provided would be a good next generation portal page. I think the portal pages should have a consistent layout, with only different pictures and links.
|
|
Hey there,
Are you suggesting a new feature for organizations in which the organization can post their meeting times? |
|
Thanks Lance
|
|
Hey there,
Yes, can you please describe in more detail what you are trying to do? Are you trying to download an image on WiserEarth at a high enough resolution to read, or are you trying to upload an image at readable resolution? |
|
That link didn't work. Trying again: http://www.wiserearth.org/organization/search?q=&r=1&groups=&is_private=&keywords=permaculture&country=Germany&name=&type=all&state=&scope=all&exclude_words=&city=&activity=all&area=&zip= |
|
Hey Christoph,
This is great work that you are doing here. I found two organizations in Germany that work in permaculture. They might have good resources: http://www.wiserearth.org/organization/search?q=&r=1&groups=&is_private=&keywords=permaculture&country=Germany&name=&type=all&state=&scope=all&exclude_words=&city=&activity=all&area=&zip= |
|
Hi Everyone,
Bowo - I think you've convinced me to become an advocate for the Earth Charter adoption. Full implementation is going to be a long process with technical issues, so I suggest we develop a short term solution that could start soon. This short term solution would have three levels. The top level would be the three areas from Earth Charter: Ecological, Social, and Democracy. The second level would hold the current 46 Areas of Focus unchanged. The bottom level would simply be the current sub-areas under the 46. The 46 Areas of Focus should probably be divided up as follows: ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY Agriculture and Farming Air Animalia Biodiversity Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Conservation Ecology Energy Fishers Forestry Global Climate Change Greening of Industry Inland Water Ecosystems Mining Plants Pollution Religion, Ecology, Sustainability Sustainable Cities Sustainable Design Terrestrial Ecosystems Water SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC Arts Business and Economic Children and Youth Cultural Heritage Education Food and Nourishment Globalization Health Human Rigths and Social Justice Indigenous People and Rights Law, Policy, Property Rights Men Population Poverty Eradication Seniors Technology Women Work DEMOCRACY Community Development Democracy and Voting Governance Media Peace, War, Security Civil Society Organizations **** In the long term I would like to see the top three levels be a carbon copy of Earth Charter, with the bottom level being redone to take the place of the current sub-areas. That could definitely be awhile, and there might be reasons why it might be bad idea that I have not thought of. Until then, I'll write up a summary of this work for presentation to Paul. Thanks Bowo for your good work. And everyone involved in this discussion should give themselves a hand. |
|
Hi Christine, Thanks for the question. Let's see if I can help you out. Once you click 'Edit' on the About section of your user profile page, an organizational entry, or almost any entity, you'll have two options on the toolbar for uploading images: Insert Internal Image - This is the method I most frequently use. It requires saving the image to your harddrive first in .gif, .jpg, of .png format. Click 'Browse' and find the folder and subfolder where you saved the image (it sounds like your default folder is the Windows Media folder). Select the image and click, 'Open.' This will load the image location into the field box back on the WiserEarth popup window. Then click, 'Upload' and wait a couple sections for image to load into the library below. Once it is the library, select it [a red box with frame the image] and then click 'Insert Image.' Insert External Image Can only except images from flickr or photobucket. Just paste the url in 'Source' and upload. Avatar: A digital representation of a user in virtual reality site [so any image you think represents you]. I hope that helps. Best. |
|
Hi Hilarie,
Thanks for another great post. You can also post multimedia like this under, "Resources" which could improve findability. The Resources feature is utilitarian right now, and hopefully it will be slicker in the future. |
1 to 20 of 162 Comments


