WiserEarth Suggestions
Building a better WiserEarth together
A place for ideas and exchanges to happen. Please provide your feedback and suggestions to improve WiserEarth here.
GROUP DETAILS
Created: Feb 11, 2008
Updated: Nov 05, 2009
Membership: Open
Public
The IPG Handbook on Environmental Funds
Resource Book for the Design and Operation of Environmental FundsSolution Info Hide
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Problem
Action
1. Define general vision – who and what the trust fund will support, and why. This is usually done in a consultative process in which the proponents of the fund convene a series of meetings with potential stakeholders and stakeholder groups.
2. Organize a steering committee. It needs to include both “workers” – people who have the expertise and time to work out the detailed design, and people with clout, who can secure the necessary high-level agreements and meetings (government ministries, international donors, etc.). The committee should also be representative of stakeholders.
3. Develop a list of potential donors and begin meetings – they should be approached by government, together with influential members of steering committee.
4. Secure financial support for planning/development phase – usually this is at least $100,000 not counting the time of people on the steering committee. Expenses generally include consultant and legal fees, meeting expenses, and travel for fundraising and other purposes.
5. Develop a more specific vision and strategy – this should be done by the steering committee in an open process that stakeholders can participate in. Questions to address:
- Role of the trust fund in the national context – relation to national plans and strategies, government, private sector, etc.
- Legal structure of the fund (trust, foundation, etc.).
- Governance (structure and composition of governing body).
- Focus of grantmaking program – purpose, objectives, who is eligible to receive grants, criteria for selecting them. Obviously this will change and develop over time but a well-developed starting point is essential.
- Financial projections – how much money will the fund need? What percentage will be endowment, what percentage long-term sinking or replenishing funds? This should be commensurate with the objectives of the grantmaking program – enough to achieve a reasonable percentage of the objectives. If that calculation runs into an impossible figure,
narrow the objectives.
6. After thorough discussion of the above points, draft conclusions into a proposal for the establishment of the fund. Consultations with donors should have been ongoing through the process. The committee is now ready to present the proposal to them. This may involve meetings with in-country officials as well as at the donor’s own national or international headquarters. See Chapter VII, “Raising capital” for more discussion of this point.
7. AFTER there is reasonable expectation of a donation (it’s in process with the donor) hire a lawyer to draft papers of incorporation and statutes or by-laws. These will define the processes for electing the governing body.
8. Incorporate the fund and elect the governing body (which should include mostly people who have served on the steering committee).
9. Receive initial funding, hire staff, open office, initiate grant program. If there is a delay between steps 8 and 9, and if there is sufficient start-up money, this period can be spent developing the board, preparing the operating manuals, drafting the terms of the first call for proposals, developing application forms, etc. Public meetings for interested parties and potential recipients explaining what the fund is all about should also be ongoing during this period.
The Handbook is available here. The contents are as follows:
I. Preface
II. What is an environmental fund, and when is it the right tool for conservation?
III. Environmental funds in the national context
IV. Legal structures of environmental funds
V. Governance
VI. Operational issues
VII. Raising capital
VIII. Asset management
Results
Global List of Environmental Funds
Established Funds, Funds in the Process of Establishment and Possible New Funds p. 107
Limitations
Environmental funds are appropriate when the threats to the environment that are being addressed are long-term and require a sustained response over a number of years. EFs are not the solution when the environmental issue in question faces major, urgent threats requiring mobilization of significant amounts of funding in a short time.
Photo Source for Solution Icon
