Campaign for Democratic Decentralisation in Kerala: An Assessment from the Perspective of Empowered Deliberative Democracy
Resource Info Edit
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Network [Add] · [List] · [Visualize]
Connected with 0 organizations
Connected with 0 people
Connected with 0 resources
Connected with 0 solutions
Connected with 0 jobs
Connected with 0 events
Connected with 0 wikipages
About [Edit]
Kerala, India's Campaign for Democratic Decentralization is surely one of the world's boldest experiments in instituting participatory democracy. For the last several decades, the state has used democratic centralist methods to institute bold programs in education, health care, and other public sectors. These programs have resulted in extremely high literacy rates and health outcomes for Keralans despite relatively low growth and high poverty.
In the past few years, the state has turned away from democratic centralism to participatory democracy in an attempt to add economic development to its successful record of social development. Beginning in 1997, the state has devolved authority to spend 40% of public monies to Local Self-Governance Institutions (LSGIs) at the village and district levels. The Campaign's architects hoped that this dramatic turn would spark the creation of administrive, political, and social capacities at most local levels. These developments would provide citizens with opportunities to articulate their real needs to government and to hold officials and agencies accountable to satisfying those needs. For a detailed treatment of the history, theory, and reality of this initiative, see T.M. Thomas Isaac (with Richard Franke) Local Democracy and Development: People's Campaign for Decentralized Planning in Kerala (New Dehli: Left World Books, 2000).
In the past few years, the state has turned away from democratic centralism to participatory democracy in an attempt to add economic development to its successful record of social development. Beginning in 1997, the state has devolved authority to spend 40% of public monies to Local Self-Governance Institutions (LSGIs) at the village and district levels. The Campaign's architects hoped that this dramatic turn would spark the creation of administrive, political, and social capacities at most local levels. These developments would provide citizens with opportunities to articulate their real needs to government and to hold officials and agencies accountable to satisfying those needs. For a detailed treatment of the history, theory, and reality of this initiative, see T.M. Thomas Isaac (with Richard Franke) Local Democracy and Development: People's Campaign for Decentralized Planning in Kerala (New Dehli: Left World Books, 2000).


