World Consumers Share Responsibility for China's Ecological Impact
Resource Info Edit
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Network [Add] · [List] · [Visualize]
Connected with 0 organizations
Connected with 0 people
Connected with 0 resources
Connected with 0 solutions
Connected with 0 jobs
Connected with 0 events
Connected with 0 wikipages
About [Edit]
Tue, 2007-05-29 21:57
ChinaDialogue.net
Consumers around the world, especially in developed countries, share responsibility for China’s growing ecological impact overseas, argues the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) in a new report.
In “Re-thinking China’s Outward Investment Flows,” published on April 25, the global conservation organisation points out that the main economic driver behind China’s growing overseas investment is its demand for natural resources to produce goods for developed country markets.
According to Dennis Pamlin, the report’s co-author and WWF International’s Global Policy Adviser, most natural resources imported to China are re-exported in the form of value-added products. For example, he says, 70% of imported timber from Southeast Asian countries is processed into furniture and exported to the United States and European Union.
Sweden has been able to reduce its carbon emissions by 10% because Chinese and Indian companies are producing for its people, he adds.
He further points out that China’s exports are dominated by foreign companies in China.
“It’s a global challenge,” says Pamlin. “And equity must not be forgotten.”
The report recommends a “triangular approach” in trade and investment analysis and policy-making, with countries classified into three groups: natural resources providers, manufacturers and consumers. Triangular discussions for sustainable globalisation—instead of the traditional bilateral dialogues—should be established between the countries and regions playing these respective roles. This approach could aid the transition towards a global circular economy, in which consumption patterns provide a higher quality of life with far lower consumption of natural resources.
ChinaDialogue.net
Consumers around the world, especially in developed countries, share responsibility for China’s growing ecological impact overseas, argues the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) in a new report.
In “Re-thinking China’s Outward Investment Flows,” published on April 25, the global conservation organisation points out that the main economic driver behind China’s growing overseas investment is its demand for natural resources to produce goods for developed country markets.
According to Dennis Pamlin, the report’s co-author and WWF International’s Global Policy Adviser, most natural resources imported to China are re-exported in the form of value-added products. For example, he says, 70% of imported timber from Southeast Asian countries is processed into furniture and exported to the United States and European Union.
Sweden has been able to reduce its carbon emissions by 10% because Chinese and Indian companies are producing for its people, he adds.
He further points out that China’s exports are dominated by foreign companies in China.
“It’s a global challenge,” says Pamlin. “And equity must not be forgotten.”
The report recommends a “triangular approach” in trade and investment analysis and policy-making, with countries classified into three groups: natural resources providers, manufacturers and consumers. Triangular discussions for sustainable globalisation—instead of the traditional bilateral dialogues—should be established between the countries and regions playing these respective roles. This approach could aid the transition towards a global circular economy, in which consumption patterns provide a higher quality of life with far lower consumption of natural resources.
Contributors to this Page
One of the keys to understand how to confront consumerism is to understand how advertising plays a key element in a market driven economy.
Understanding how advertising re-framed the concept of citizen into consumer and how that played such an important role in creating the consumer society.
Seventy percent of the economy is based on consumerism, creating new rules for a better, less distructive economic structure is the task.
So where do we start?