Should Change Be Radical? by Jody Boehnert
Resource Info Edit
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Network [Add] · [List] · [Visualize]
Connected with 1 organization
Connected with 0 people
Connected with 6 resources
Connected with 0 jobs
Connected with 0 events
Connected with 0 wikipages
Areas of Focus [Edit]
Permaculture | Local Food Systems | Film | Renewable Energy | Environmental Education | Life Cycle Assessment | Energy Security and Sustainability | Sustainable Energy Development | Sustainable Building | Property Rights | Sustainability and Technology | Community Enterprise | Social Entrepreneurship | Ecological Economics | Socially Responsible Investment | Sustainable Materials | Sustainability Education | EcoVillages | Recycling and Reuse | Democratic Participation | Ecolabeling and Certification | Sustainable Communities | Sustainable Forestry | Appropriate Technology | Sustainable Urban and Regional Planning | Community Participation | Dialogue, Deliberation and Consensus-Building | Sustainable Agriculture | Responsible Business Practices | Sustainable Production | Internet | Media and Communication | Urban Revitalization | Arts Activism
About [Edit]
Should Change be Radical?
New design processes lead radical change
This paper describes how new design models characterized by systems thinking and the democratisation of design have the capacity for radical change. Three contemporary projects; the Open Architecture Network, Massive Change, and Transition Towns are all very different but potentially significant examples of this new design model in action.
Contributors to this Page
