fea8 Forum: Roles and responsibilities of Editors. Let's define together. - WiserEarth
 
 

WiserEarth Editors

Collaboration in serving the greater WiserEarth community

As active community members, we would like to make this group into a gathering point where we can work together to transform WiserEarth.org into an effective platform of support for the global community of concerned citizens and organizations who are working to create a more just and sustainable world. ...learn more

GROUP DETAILS

Created: Nov 20, 2007

Updated: Nov 25, 2009

Membership: Invitation Only

Semi-Private

Created: Oct 05, 2008
Updated: Dec 19, 2008
Viewed: 613 times

Topic: Roles and responsibilities of Editors. Let's define together.

Posts (1 - 16 of 16)

Sort by: Ascending | Descending
Login to Post a Reply.
Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

Hello everyone,

 

Thanks for all of you who've participated in the recent survey for group members on being an Editor. For a summary of the results, click here.

 

From answers to question #10, have emerged some very good thinking on what role(s) Editors should play in WiserEarth. I propose that we discuss this here further and establish 'official' roles for Editors to then incorporate into the WiserEarth Editor job posting.

 

Quoting Mike's (MichaelK) comment in the past on this topic, "As WiserEarth evolves, I imagine many of us will be able to specialize more on specific tasks. More of us will team up on the same role. Fewer of us will be spread out over the site being involved in every discussion and task," ....these roles should help Editors focus on improving specific aspects of WiserEarth's platform, content and community 

 

Here are some questions to help with our discussion here:

1. What general role and tasks for every Editor? In other words, what will differentiate Editors from general users? (some of you have answered this in the survey)

2. What specific roles should we create for Editors? (name of these roles, tasks for each role).

3. How many hours per week or per month should each Editor commit to their chosen role?

4. Can an Editor have more than one role? If yes, should there be limits?

5. How would Editors with the same role team up?

 

You can throw in your thoughts freely, or by quoting and answering each question. You can also propose another question for others to elaborate upon. Consider reading through answers to question #10 in the survey and the WiserEarth Community Roles page before proceeding.

 

And here's one answer from a respondent in the survey to keep in mind:

 

"It should be easy for an editor to help out, but not put very much obligation or expect much from them because they are volunteers."

 

Thoughts?

Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

2. What specific roles should we create for Editors? (name of these roles, tasks for each role).

Here's one editing role that keeps popping up in answers to question #10 in the survey:

  • To be mindful to respect other peoples opinions as well as try to guide non constructive thought toward constructive ends.
  • Keep the knowledge base growing and maintain accuracy. Foster discussion.
  • Writing editorials , responding to member FAQ,s , moderating group discussions , sending invitations about upcoming events , staying connected to members with a view to realising wiser earths goals and objectives.
  • They should ensure that information in their AoF is accurate and relevant. They should facilitate ease of use and steer the conversation toward constructive dialogue.
  • create content, facilitate discussion, have an specific area of focus or organize group.

We can name this editing role Discussion Moderator. I imagine editors with this role to

  • Monitor the View all comments page, join a number of groups relevant with their interest or areas of expertise, to then participate in or start discussions wherever and whenever applicable.
  • Use the group messaging feature which is available to any group's member to invite others to the discussion.
  • Ensure that comments in discussions are in line with terms of use and community guidelines. Suppress comments when deemed necessary, following the editorial policy
  • Monitor their Areas of Focus portals for comments from the greater WiserEarth community (by adding them to watchlist). Respond or follow-up when applicable.
  • Connect new community members to discussions relevant with what they wrote in their profile page.
Sm_avatar

I would be interested in moderating a discussion on development economics, which is currently an academic and practical disaster area. See, for example, Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents. What we could be doing is hinted at in Development as Freedom, by Amartya Sen, in the classic Small is Beautiful, by E. F. Schumacher, and in recent work of Jeffrey Sachs, Muhammad Yunus, and others.

 

My starting point is thinking about the economic, social, and political impact of integrated development, including education, broadband communications, renewable energy, microfinance, health, civil society institutions, and much more. I have been collecting examples of global best practices in each of those areas. The one I concentrate most of my efforts on is One Laptop Per Child. I consider OLPC to be the necessary infrastructure for everything else, in addition to its obvious merits for preparing children to take real jobs, or better still, to start businesses together and create many more jobs for other school graduates.

 

The end result of this chain of thought is twofold: A way to create a genuine Free Market, and in consequence the End of Poverty at a Profit all around, for the formerly poor most of all. Genuine Free Trade is not the current nonsense where corporations can go anywhere and do anything but people can't. The definition of a competitive free market is that no actor has sufficient market power to set prices or otherwise regulate the behavior of others, so that market forces, aka supply and demand, will tend to set prices as low as possible consistent with paying for providing them. This is what I propose that the billion children of the world aim at in creating their new enterprises, and this is what computer and communications technology can support as nothing before.

 

I have costed out the entire plan, which is well within the resources that are pledged to development, and I am assembling a team to carry it out. I also need people who can criticize the plan intelligently, not from the armchair, but from the ground, and help us to improve it. Particularly from among the poor, who know what their immediate problems are better than any of us.

Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago
Thank you Edward for your thoughts. Just want to remind you that this thread is about defining roles for WiserEarth Editors. I would be happy to discuss your ideas in another, more appropriate forum.
Sm_avatar
wolf about 1 year ago
Ok this is two times I've tried to type in replys here and my text has just disappeared...i think we have a bug
Sm_avatar
wolf about 1 year ago
Ok this is two times I've tried to type in replys here and my text has just disappeared...i think we have a bug
Sm_avatar
wolf about 1 year ago

Our comment/reply system is definitely tweeking out right now

 

my last and final try to make it work:

 

we should not try to reinvent the wheel re: editing/editors...Jimmy Wales has done an incredible job of facilitating the community's editing process over at wikipedia.  We should set up a meeting with Jimmy (I'm happy to call this meeting) to find out ways to collaborate with him/his model. 

 

I found this on their site which is quite interesting especially the list of articles that havent been edited since 2005 and therefore there is certainly room for us at WE to improve the "wheel" that Jimmy has forged

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_portal
Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

Sorry to hear about the trouble with posting your comments Scott. Perhaps you can report it in the Help Desk along with you browser and OS info so we can have the tech team fix it? As a habit, I always copy my comment before posting it anywhere in the web, not just in WE. Just in case anything funny happens.

 

Regarding the wheel. Yes, we did examine some parts of Wikipedia's model a while back (including the Community Portal), but not thoroughly enough it seems. Would absolutely be great if you can contact Jimmy on this! Gee... wish I can be there in that meeting! Or could you possible get Jimmy in our group? I will be glad to send him an invitation if he's interested (will need his email address).

 

Two things to keep in mind:

  • For WE the case is a bit different as WE intends to be more than an encyclopedia. WE want to be a community directory and networking platform for 'things' that matters (people, organizations, groups, discussions, resources, events, jobs, articles, solutions). 
  • What we see now in Wikipedia is a result of several years active community involvement, and thus is well suited to the dynamics of Wikipedians. We'll need to go through the process ourselves as WiserEarthlings and come up with something well suited for our needs. Defining together editing roles like what we're trying to do here seems like the next best step toward that end.

Regardless, I'm sure there are many things that we can learn from Wikipedia (for example, see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quick_directory). Thus, would be great to have Jimmy on board.

Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

2. What specific roles should we create for Editors? (name of these roles, tasks for each role).

 

Here's another possible role we can call Outreach from answers to question #10 in the survey::

  • I think the role of an editor on WiserEarth should be to watch for accuracy and relevance, contribute more to content and depth of the site, actively look for ways to improve upon the site's design, encourage other users, and promote it wherever possible.
  • Promoting, recruiting participation, adding content, maintaining standards, and helping the public to better know how to use this powerful too
  • Writing editorials , responding to member FAQ,s , moderating group discussions , sending invitations about upcoming events , staying connected to members with a view to realising wiser earths goals and objectives.
  • Use one's area of expertise to improve the WiserEarth directory and outreach to relevant organizations/individuals.
  • 1) keeping the portal page for her focus area up to date 2) contacting web sites related to the focus area with an eye to increasing membership and incoming links 3) participating in the editor's group

Which seems to be what some group members already do. From answers to qustion #16 "If you are interested in helping WiserEarth in other ways, please write your thoughts below":

  • I have already been promoting within my org.
  • I'm curious if there's been any sort of advertising for WiserEarth. I feel like getting the word out to all the other orgs that have been databased would greatly increase membership. Has this been attempted, and if so, can I help?
  • I do a great deal of promotion of WE when I am not logged in. My WE profile link is often on the bottom of my e-mails or written on business cards I exchange with like-minded people. I've spent a fair bit of time teaching others how to use the site and its amazing functionality. I'd like to continue in that teaching and outreach role. How much time I can spend on-line goes in spurts depending on the demands of my paid work. I am proud to be associated with WiserEarth and the Natural Capital Institute. I actively promoted WE through inclusion on my LinkedIn profile as well postings and e-mail to everyone I think would benefit. But most of my promotion of WE occurs in person among friends and contacts. I enjoy this role even more than editing the site itself.
  • Co Ordinating global campaigns and call to action.
Sm_avatar

Wow, there's a lot of information going on here. Hmm, so far it looks like 4 roles have been suggested or defined, and those descriptions seem to be well laid-out already:

Area of Focus, Directory Editor, Discussion Moderator (or just Moderator? also listed on the Editor job page), Outreach

This sounds like plenty of variety in terms of roles. I think editors should have the ability to pick more than one, but maybe start with 1-2, and if they're really ambitious, take on 3. If there is a need for a very different type of role, that can be created later on.

How about if the editors pick from these four roles, and then we have four respective discussion groups where the editors can discuss tips and suggestions for their role, and helpful experience? We can also keep a tally of how many are in each role to see where more help is needed. Also, proportionally, there might be the largest need for directory editors, because that is a huge job.

 

I think hours need to be somewhat flexible for the volunteers. There will be some editors who can contribute more hours, and some less. Each editor could state about how many hours they expect to contribute that month to their team (of other editors in that role), and then the work can be divided up accordingly.

Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

Great comments Kerry. Summing up what we have to this point under the original questions:

 

1. What general role and tasks for every Editor? In other words, what will differentiate Editors from general users? (some of you have answered this in the survey)

"I think the main distinction with editors thus far is not that they are so much more talented or skilled than the non-editor user, but that they have decided to devote a certain amount of time towards Wiser." (Kerry in a discussion with me via WE internal messaging system. Hope you don't mind me quoting this Kerry)

 

2. What specific roles should we create for Editors? (name of these roles, tasks for each role).

AoF Editor, Directory Editor, Moderator, Outreach (see preceeding discussion and WE Editors job page for more details)

 

3. How many hours per week or per month should each Editor commit to their chosen role?

Based on answers to Q15 in the survey, it seems that a commitment between one to five hours a week is reasonable. Kerry's idea to ask editors in advance of time availability for the following month is great.

 

4. Can an Editor have more than one role? If yes, should there be limits?

Yes. They may want to focus on their chosen role(s) but can be flexible when time and resources permits to help out Editors with other roles. Up to three roles seems reasonable.

 

5. How would Editors with the same role team up?

By creating a discussion, wiki and create a list of weekly tasks around each role, categorized by time needed to accomplish tasks (the discussion can happen in the comment section of the wiki). This should be done in this group. Once things are concluded, Editors with the same role can proceed to manage relevant working groups of the Editors group, or create new ones as needed.

 

How does this sound?

Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

Here are some other possible roles based on the answers to question #10 in the survey

 

Network Connector (Networker? Organizer?)

- Create, grow, and manage groups around specific issues

- Connect users who share similar interest and work

- Connect groups wih similar focus

 

Community Support (Support?)

- Welcome/mentor new users. Provide help, guidance and coaching for users and group admins

- Maintain FAQ pages, tutorials and other help articles

 

Platform Developer (Developer?)

- Investigate ways to make the platform more usable and useful to the community.

- Help create technical-specification / mockups / code to add functions or fix bugs in the future

Sm_avatar
Its been touched on a bit, but following on steering members to constructive (rather than destructive) contributions, I could image the case where a member has made repeated violations of the Community Guidelines / Values. Should the Editors, as guardians of the community, have the decision making authority (presumably collectively) to ask an Administrator to remove a member? I'm not talking here about spammers but more members who contribute but in such a way that they damage the sense of community on WiserEarth through personal attacks on other members etc and despite being given guidance do not change their behavior.
Sm_avatar
bowo about 1 year ago

@Angus: Yes, I think Editors should be granted that authority. We'll need to define specific procedures for that (e.g. How to start the deliberation process? Should all Editors agree on the decision? Etc.)

 

In fact, we may as well create an Editor role for that:

 

Mediator

- Help mediate user conflicts

- Steering members to contribute constructively

- Recommend new / changes to policies and guidelines related to community interaction

 

How does this sound?

 

More roles in relation to WiserEarth intention to go truly global.

 

Language Support

- Translate WiserEarth's interface into different languages

- Translate key contents (About Us page, etc.) into different languages

- Facilitate cross-language communication between users

 

Regional Coordinator

- Spearhead outreach and localization effort for a country

- Create, grow and manage regional/national group

- Gather and entry region-specific entities (orgs, events, resources...)

- Develop regional portals (wikipages)

 

Another role to help with outreach and community engagement:

 

Community Journalist

- Gather interesting news and development within and about WiserEarth

- Conduct interviews with active / prominent community members.

- Create and distribute a WiserEarth newsletter for distribution

 

Also, one role that needs to be mentioned

 

Staff

- Editors whose job is to develop and grow WiserEarth

- Staff of the Natural Capital Institute

 

So, it seems that we have defined a good amount of specific Editor roles relating to content, community and platform.

 

Content: Directory Editor, AoF Editor

 

Community: Moderator, Networker, Outreach, Regional Coordinator, Support, Journalist, Mediator

 

Platform: Developer, Language Support

 

Feel free to comment further on these roles and associated responsibilities/tasks for each role. I've also listed these roles in the WiserEarth Editors and Administrators wiki.

Sm_avatar

Is there a document that I am missing that relates to editors and what  AOF they watch? Without some list to know if editors are covering the portals adequately, won't some portals will get loved and rubbed and others languish and be sad?

 

I don't like the idea of portals wasting away for lack of attention. Let me know what I am missing!

 

~h

Sm_avatar

There is a document for that which we'll need to revise in light of recent changes and upcoming work to better organize the process of updating AoF portals. Here it is: Area of Focus - List of Editors

It's part of our working group WiserEarth Area of Focus Editors (which also needs updating and reactivating). Feel free to throw in any idea you have to make that page more intuitive and useful.

You do not have access to post to this record
1 to 16 of 16 Posts


Contributors to this Page

0