WiserEarth Area of Focus Suggestions

Improving WiserEarth Areas of Focus

List suggestions for new areas of focus or for changes to the current areas of focus

GROUP DETAILS

Created: Apr 21, 2008

Updated: Nov 20, 2009

Membership: Open

Semi-Private

Return Return to Files & Photos for group Insulating the Third Rail--Human Overpopulation
 
Created: Oct 28, 2009
Updated: Oct 29, 2009
Viewed: 25 times
Page Status: active

Family planning and economic well-being: New evidence from Bangladesh

Download

File Info 

File Size: 147.45 KB
 
File Type: pdf
 
Keywords: family population planning economic Bangladesh
 

About

Families in communities where the FPMCH program was implemented became wealthier and healthier than families who lived in other, similar communities. Family planning is one of the most cost-effective health interventions in the developing world.1 For decades, research has shown that for a relatively modest investment, family planning saves lives and improves maternal and child health. Although it seems intuitive that investing in family planning would also lift fami- lies out of poverty by helping poor women have fewer children, there have been relatively few studies to shed light on this relationship. Now, a new study on Bangla- desh provides evidence that long-term investment in an integrated family planning and maternal and child health (FPMCH) program contributes to improved economic security for families, households, and communities through larger incomes, greater accumulation of wealth, and higher levels of education.2 The evidence indicates that family planning and maternal-child health services help reduce poverty, the first goal of the Millennium Development Goals.

Comments (1 - 3 of 3)

Login to Post a Comment.
Avatar-default

References to western countries giving the green revolution to Africa are in several of Lindsey Grant's books, and others.

It wasn't just Africa but India, also, along with other third world nations.  It had to do with no just giving technology, but seeds, fertilizers, drilling wells, and of course, shipping food directly during several famines.  It sure didn't lower the population!  Later, UN family planning helped lower the TFR  slightly.  Of course, anything over 1 either keeps the overpopulation status quo, or makes it worse.  The last TFR reports from India are 2.6 and Africa around 6.  This keeps the crash curve going.  The eco-collapse of regions may start in Bangladesh and spread to India first, or may start in Africa first, but will inevitably cascade to a global phenomenon.  Like in Grant's Juggernaut, unstoppable.

Sm_avatar

To quote from your bio page - "Nearly all of human and environmental problems have their root in overpopulation."  I totally agree.  I'm on a listserv that provided me with this information, the web site is:  http://www.populationmedia.org/

 

I'll continue posting things that I find interesting and that might help us from that listserv.  Regarding your reference to Africa - how could I learn more?

Avatar-default
Supposed do-gooders have always tried to put it that poverty comes first before overpopulation.  I always point out their illogic with the fact that pre and post WWII, western nations gave technology,seeds, fertilizer, physical and financial help to African and other third world countries to help lift their standard of living.  All they did was breed more to the point of even worse overpopulation and poverty.  I've tried to show them that the laws of economics are; more people = less jobs and lowered wages= more poverty.  Yet they always insist that poverty makes them have more kids.  I'm glad their are more facts with this study to show that less kids = better living standard.
1 to 3 of 3 Comments

Contributors to this Page

Add this file to Del.icio.us Add this file to Technorati Add this file to digg Add this file to FURL Add this file to blinklist Add this file to reddit Add this file to Yahoo My Web Add this file to Newsvine