Repeal the Texas Death Penalty

Repealing the Texas Death Penalty

GROUP DETAILS

Created: Mar 23, 2009

Updated: Aug 19, 2009

Membership: Open

Semi-Private

 
Created: Mar 31, 2009
Updated: May 11, 2009
Viewed: 397 times
Page Status: active
  •  
1 Rating

Project process: what are we doing

Access Privileges

Access is currently restricted to the following group(s):

 

This page is our central focus of 'doing it' - here be information on: 

 

Purpose of the web project

Purpose of collaborative phase (that's this one)

List of tasks and people

Timing for the work to be done

Decision making

Money stuff

Research streams and proposed structure for documentation

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Purpose of the web project:

 

"A set of networks of people taking responsibility and providing support for different aspects of Transition Network, for example, people looking after local initiatives in a region, people from similar theme group to share best practice and support eachother" (Gary Alexander)

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Purpose of this collaborative phase:

  1. Submit a recommendations report to the Transition Network board regarding suitable solutions for this "web project"
  2. Consult with the transitioners everywhere about the web project
  3. Build capacity amongst transitioners for their own sustainability
  4. De-centralise and share the work and responsibility around the network
  5. Document lessons from the project and make those learnings available to relevant groups 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------


List of tasks: and people!

 

Early list - please add your suggestions or put your initials next to one, or ...

 


Summarise discussions to date from: TTforum, Ning, ethical jcn, TT wiki
Routemap: Education and support toolkit: outline of standards, guidelines, support groups, management issues
Transition Network website: outline of requirements, management issues
Knowledge stream: outline of work to date, review pilot, summarise findings, identify missing elements
Local and regional presence stream: outline of work to date, review pilot, summarise findings
Training stream: outline of work to date, review pilot, summarise findings; review alternatives to pilot platform
Aggregation: outline of theory and design – projects, profiles, events, news, discussions
Evaluation of some initiative sites on different platforms: e.g. compare and contrast MASTT, Transition East, Transition Bristol
Pilot support in general: write help files, set up accounts, support, bug finding, using the pilots, usability analysis etc.
Hosting analysis; outline of possible providers considering ethics and environmental issues, more detailed analysis of centralised vs mesh networking...
General discussions around subjects...

 

 


NEEDED:

Someone with expertise in usability to look at our local and regional pilot Transition East and advise us. We know there is a lot still to do on this, and are planning to work on it quite soon, so we would be grateful for some other people's views. We are, of course, asking all our early users to comment on their experience for this purpose too.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Timing

Week number and Monday date Activities
1: 30/03

Set up Wiser Earth

Move to Wiser Earth

Identification of activities (people find things they want to do)

2: 06/04 Identification of activities (people find things they want to do)

Content gathering and summarising

Stream building - identifying/rationalising stream's needs

Business requirements meeting PL, BB, EM in Bristol 07/04

Recommendations clarification: BB, EM

Easter holiday! Get those fairtrade eggs hidden down the allotment!

3: 13/04

What does the web project look like? (group work on whole project; prioritisation of elements)

Identification of activities (people find things they want to do)

Stream analysis and collaboration work - identifying/rationalising stream's needs

Core meeting, London: Key subjects: Conference, key requirements for pilots, workgroup assessment, tech guy, recommendations, survey

Survey closes

Survey data analysis (BB and EM, Totnes 16/04, 17/04) and results

4: 20/04

Survey data available to workgroup, Transition US, LCCN, etc.

Stream analysis and collaboration work - identifying/rationalising stream's needs

5: 27/04

Pilot interviews

Technical assessment of platforms

6: 04/05

Core meeting

Technical assessment of platforms

Report writing

7: 11/05

Report writing

Technical assessment of platforms

8: 18/05

Board meeting 19/05: presentation of recommendations

Conference 23/05: workshop at conference

Workgroup meetup and beano: 21/05 or 25/05?

9: 27/05  Have a nice sit down and a cup of tea. 
 

 

--------------------------------------

 

 

Decision-making and process

There are several, potentially conflicting, elements to this:

 

  1. The funding from Tudor means that one of the absolutely key priorities is getting the Transition Network web presence spruced up
  2. Transition Network is a charity with the typical hierarchical set up:
    • a management team, and
    • a board of trustees who are legally obliged to see that we spend our money in pursuit of our charitable objects, and
    • in the context of this project, a core team of Ben, Ed and Gary
  3. One of the principles of transition is subsidiarity
    • decisions are made at the lowest appropriate level, and no further
    • creating conditions that encourage self-organising is smart
  4. The expertise to figure out what we need to do on this project lies significantly with the amorphous gang of highly-motivated smart thinkers who have varying degrees of involvement with transition  - aka "Experts"
  5. We need to get input from as many transition groups as possible (via survey)
  6. All the contributors need to have a sense that they have a voice in what we end up doing

So here's how I think the process needs to be working in terms of making decisions:

  •  
    • Ed engages with the experts to shape the project
      • done, and as a result there has been a huge shift in the potential "deliverables"
    • Core team takes input from:
      • pilots - ongoing
      • survey - ongoing
      • interviews - ongoing
      • Expert involvement - ongoing
    • Core team makes available to the Experts the data and analysis from inputs
    • Core team pulls a few all-nighters to analyse the data from the Core team perspective
    • Experts analyse the data from their perspective
    • Core team and Experts share conclusions and figure out the way forward - mebbe we have an awayday
    • Core team writes up the results of discussions into recommendations report to Transition Network board (cc'ed to Experts)
    • Experts make comments on the report and it gets amended
    • the board responds to the recommendations report with an item-level "yes"/"yes with these changes"/"no" (Ben will not be "on the board" for this decision)
    • if the Experts and Core team differ significantly on what needs to be done, the Experts will get a chance to put their case to the Transition Network board
    • we get on with the work based on the Trustees decision

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Money and transparency

• Can we discuss this publicly?

This is being clarified by Ben right now.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Research streams: proposed structure for documentation


Full live list of wiki pages


• Knowledge and Networking (KN)
• Local and Regional Presence (LRP)
• Training
• Transition Network site
• Aggregation and the distributed web
• Routemap: support and education toolkit
• Hosting
• Business: information, funding, metrics
• Philosophy: centralized and distributed: what is core?
• Lessons Learnt: valuable findings about the project to share after the project

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Assets to work with: content to support collaboration

• Forum conversations: TT forums, Ning forums
• Spectifications: the original one and the pilots
• Survey questions and answers
• Workshop findings and materials (more to come)
• Interviews (due to come from pilot users)
• Pilots: qualitative findings from test usage


--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This here for scrap-book purposes...

 

Who is doing what in which section?

 

----

Transition Network site

 

Ben Brangwyn

 


----

Knowledge and Networking

 

Jon Walker: pilot design (project and findings)

P2P networking:

 

----

Local and regional presence

 

Gary Alexander: pilot design

Other?

 

----

Aggregation and making the most of the wider web

 

Person

Person

 

----

Routemap: support and education toolkit

 

Person

Person

 

----

Hosting

 

Person

Person

 

 

----

Business information

 

Ben Brangwyn

Person

 

 

----

Centralisation

 

Person

 

----

Lessons learnt

 

Ed Mitchell

 



Comments (1 - 7 of 7)

Login to Post a Comment.
Sm_avatar

Hey Ed, Geoff,

 

Thanks for reporting this - just wanted you both to know this is very much on our radar, and I'll report back once I have updates on this issue.

 

Best,

Honore

Sm_avatar

@geoffstafford - thanks - I will forward this to bowo who is helping us out and always interested to hear what's going on.

 

@tjmenck - glad to hear it - we've cracked the basic structure of the project now, and are looking into the 'how to deliver it' over on the Ubergeek week page - please feel free to weigh in. One more week until we're at teh conference and then the recommendations to the board!

Sm_avatar

Great work guys on starting to get the documentation sorted out. As an outside observer, it's been really difficult for me to get any sense of what's already been discussed, collated, decided or developed, through the original forums. It looks like starting with a [basic] structure and getting comment, feedback, etc could help.

 

I appreciate the vast complexity of the journey taken so far and look forward to seeing where the above proposals are going.

 

Regards

Tyson

Sm_avatar

I'm sure this comment doesn't belong here, but rather than just logging off: It seems like there are loads of links which lead to blank pages. As an IT professional with 30 years experience I suspect the site... I'm using Firefox 3.0.4 also tried Microsuck Explorer 6 without much success.

 

4 examples which give me blank pages:

http://www.wiserearth.org/article/8b649a45a096e25ad4ad2b366a23723f

http://www.wiserearth.org/article/0495aa40e690c095a68c853853a6864e

http://www.wiserearth.org/article/0d0b56a07e50a31bf66a553baf05190e

http://www.wiserearth.org/article/d47786c9bae1cba0e54d9fed169abc96/group/transition_webproject

 

Our site is here: http://transitiontownstafford.org.uk

Sm_avatar

 

1. The funding from Tudor means that one of the absolutely key priorities is getting the Transition Network web presence spruced up

Q: How do the Tudor Trust intend on measuring the Spruced Upness, are there minimum requirements set out for this or is it a case of "ooooh, that w w w Transition Web Project looks lovely, didn't they do well, another cup of fair trade tea Mildred?" at a board meeting type thing?

 




Sm_avatar

@Sandi (Macrocosm):

You can actually see where Ed last posted his comment. Go to Ed's profile, click Activity Reports tab, click View comments by edmittance, find relevant comment, click "view context" to go to the page where he made that comment. Or, have you try using the search box on the group's homepage?

Sm_avatar

As for my opinion regarding TRANSITION EAST using Plone, it looks like you are painstakingly using a difficult program, to imitate Ning, Grou.ps or Mixxt.com - and even Wiserearth.org. I find that Plone, Drupal, Joomla, whatever usually require very costly professionals, plus they are not hosted. Regional sites would be hard pressed to emulate, too.

 

I am actually looking for the spot that Ed last posted a message, and I seem to be going around and around in circles here. I really wish we had forums like they have in mixxt.com or even the old ppBBS.

1 to 7 of 7 Comments