Peer Reviewed Solution Directory +3
Cross-listed: WiserEarth Suggestions and Conservation Yellow Pages
Problem Statement:
People want to easily find the best approach for solving a problem. The issue is that its hard to find these best practices - they are all over the internet in different websites, or as MS Word or PDF based manuals.
Proposed Approach:
- A directory of high quality, peer reviewed, best practices (called solutions prior to review) tagged using a standard taxonomy of problem and actions categories
- Where solutions are described in a networked context showing relationships to practitioners, consultants, funders, case studies, organizations and groups.
- Where a high level of community participation provides feedback and improves the quality of best practices over time.
- Where incentives exists for the community to develop new best practices where gaps exist.
Status of this Suggestion:
Functionality that
would permit any Community of Practice to develop a directory of solutions for
their area of knowledge will be coded over the next couple of months. This
programming will be part of a project to create a Directory of Conservation
Best Practices called the Conservation Yellow Pages. With this ‘suggestion wiki’
we hope to reach out to the wider WE community to test the design and solicit
improvements. This is in some ways one of the first new functionalities that will be available to the WE community to use as a result of open sourcing the platform.
by angusparker
More Info:
• What is a Best Practice?
– A technique or methodology that, through replication and evaluation, has proven to be the most efficient (least amount of effort) and effective (best results) way of accomplishing a task in a given setting.
• Who can submit a Best Practice?
– Anyone can recommend a best practice to the community by submitting its details online. We encourage people who did not create the Best Practice to make those that did aware that the Best Practice is being catalogued on Wiser Earth.
• Does a Best Practice have to be peer reviewed?
– Solutions can remain unreviewed but a Best Practice requires a review. Reviewed solutions (now called Best Practices) will be more likely to be noticed and used by WiserEarthlings.
• How is a Best Practice reviewed and approved?
– Once the data around a practice has been collected as a solution it can be sent for review to one of the existing WE Review panels. At first only a few of these will exist but over time it is hope more communities of practice will want to participate on WE. Once submitted for review, the review panel will take up to four weeks to conduct its research. Besides a document review, the panel will interview the Best Practice creator, at least one Best Practice implementer, and the Best Practice endorser for input.
– Best Practices will be either (a) Accepted with no modifications, (b) Provisionally Accepted with requested modifications, or (c) Rejected with causes given.
• Who ‘owns’ the Best Practice?
– The person or group on Wiser Earth that recommended the Best Practice has administrative rights to edit the Best Practice. However, as part of the public publishing process the original author of the Best Practice will be informed of the entry on Wiser Earth and she/he be encouraged to take ownership or co-ownership of the Wiser Earth entry.
• How is the Best Practice kept updated?
– Any ‘owner’ of a Best Practice can make updates to reflect changes to the materials and to incorporate community feedback. The community can contribute to the ‘network’ by showing new relationships links between the best practice and people, projects, case studies, organizations and groups. Every year a reminder email will be sent to the ‘owner’ and to the ‘contact person/creator’ to encourage an update to the materials.
• How can I provide feedback and improve a Best Practice?
– Anyone can provide a comment to a Best Practice. These comments are automatically sent via email to the people who manage the Best Practice.
– If you have implemented a Best Practice you are encouraged to provide a Project Case Study example. Your responses will be forwarded to those that manage the Best Practice.
• Best Practice should have been implemented successfully in at least three different projects
• Best Practice should be endorsed by at least one other organization or group within the relevant community
• Best Practice should be replicable by its intended audience
– The resources (leadership, labor, finances etc) are in keeping with the capabilities of the types of organizations, groups or people that are intended to implement the Best Practice.
• Best Practice should be complete
– Key Info, Problem, Action, Results, Limitations, Attachments, Project Case Studies and Network sections should be filled out as best as is possible
• Best Practice should be the ‘Best’
– No alternative technique or method is both more efficient (least amount of effort) and effective (best results) in accomplishing a task in the same setting.
Comments (1 - 10 of 10)
|
Flag comment for removal bowo 6 months ago
Good idea. Let's do :)
|
|
Hi Bowo,
It looks like our comments have strayed from the topic of this article. I suggest we move our conversation elsewhere, perhaps the community guidelines page. (I hope this is not being impolite, but I guess that would be debatable. :) |
|
Fair comment. I guess people have their own method of communication. My simple request would be to be a wee bit more mindful when using those 'adjectives'. I think we want to cultivate understanding and friendship in WE. Here's a line from our community guidelines:
Be Polite and Civil Remember that the WiserEarth community consists of people from all over the world with different native languages and varying degrees of technical knowledge. Please be polite and civil with other people and assume good faith at all times.
I personally think that a solid and clear argument doesn't require such 'adjectives'. Larry King and Oprah would be good examples of people with such arguments (and people seems to respond extremely well to them). |
|
Yah, I know I can come across as a "wee bit 'harsh'" sometimes. Honestly, I just try to be really clear, which means I have to use some "adjectives" once in a while. For example, one of my main beef's with mainstream news is that when they bring up something like torture, they don't jump up and down (well, not literally, but perhaps :) and impress on people how serious and terrible an issue it is--giving history, associations, meanings, and such--or at least use some "adjectives." Hence, we get an apathetic public. :(
PS: I still stand behind my "adjectives". :) |
|
Fair comment... though a wee bit 'harsh' if you know what I mean :)
I personally think the basic idea is solid, though the implementation can be overwhelming for some. The core tenet of WiserEarth is to provide and link up spaces for communities of action. So, although those spaces can appear as worlds in themselves, WiserEarth enables interconnection and sharing between those spaces. Just like our groups actually. For end users though, it should be a simple directory of peer-reviewed, proven solutions. Domain experts will deal with the gory details.
Speaking of details... need to remember that "the devil is in it". People speak of the next great idea, but when it's down to the details, there's just not much to it. I like the level of details provided in a solution record. I think it will be a great help for people who want to replicate and adapt the solution for their locality/situation.
Anyway, it's a done deal (implemented already) and people have only begun using it. |
|
This suggestion seems to stem from a serious misconception of the WE community: a misdirection for it. I feel that implementing this would be a tragic waste of time and resources. Other organizations that specialize in this type of thing--for example, http://www.catcomm.org/--should just be linked to for any specific practices that are appropriate to WE. The detailed process in this suggestion is a world in itself, and not appropriate for the higher-level functionality that WE should concentrate on. (For example, the WE rating system is not even practically functional yet. How can WE be on target with it's goals if it does not have a adequate feedback system?)
|
|
wow, I'm excited to partake in this and help the process by contributing the database of best practices we're developing at Creative Citizen.
This is going to be fabulous! |
|
@JPMS: Thank you. Like the distinction about culture/place/resource specificity. I will work it into the FAQs. The networks around each practice (aka Solution) will be either on WE or some othe platform. I won't be taking on responsibility for managing that need but I hope others in the community will if a good practice develops a community of users.
|
|
Wonderful Idea Angus!... but defining a "best practice" should also be cultural, place and resource specific to give the widest possible potential for adoption and/or educational benefits. Where cultures, locations and resources are different, it would also be helpful to establish a network that could help adapt the "best practice" to other realities.
|
|
What a great idea! My +5... err.. +1 for now. More later.
|


